<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SharePoint Conference in Slovenia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sharepointboris.net/2009/06/sharepoint-conference-in-slovenia-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sharepointboris.net/2009/06/sharepoint-conference-in-slovenia-2/</link>
	<description>and Boris Gomiunik</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:38:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris Gomiunik</title>
		<link>http://www.sharepointboris.net/2009/06/sharepoint-conference-in-slovenia-2/#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris Gomiunik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 19:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boris.gomiunik.net/2009/06/sharepoint-conference-in-slovenia-2/#comment-488</guid>
		<description>Looks like it will keep to tables :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like it will keep to tables <img src='http://www.sharepointboris.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Doe</title>
		<link>http://www.sharepointboris.net/2009/06/sharepoint-conference-in-slovenia-2/#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator>John Doe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boris.gomiunik.net/2009/06/sharepoint-conference-in-slovenia-2/#comment-487</guid>
		<description>It seems that microsoft moved ahead with sharepoint, but still it&#039;s their thinking that has not improved. SP is so tehcnical and heavy to understand, if you put a developer that never used it before, you will brake his will...
Anyway are they going for the XHTML standard or are they still using those damn tables?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that microsoft moved ahead with sharepoint, but still it&#8217;s their thinking that has not improved. SP is so tehcnical and heavy to understand, if you put a developer that never used it before, you will brake his will&#8230;<br />
Anyway are they going for the XHTML standard or are they still using those damn tables?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

